<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Buy Acular Without Prescription</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shopyield.com/2009/11/19/taxing-derivatives-excessive-leverage-and-a-jobs-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shopyield.com/2009/11/19/taxing-derivatives-excessive-leverage-and-a-jobs-program/</link>
	<description>Building a retail fixed income industry... join in...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Buy Acular Without Prescription</title>
		<link>http://shopyield.com/2009/11/19/taxing-derivatives-excessive-leverage-and-a-jobs-program/#comment-10309</link>
		<dc:creator>cate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shopyield.com/?p=5591#comment-10309</guid>
		<description>Press Release
Release Date: November 18, 2009

SIFMA Opposes Securities Transaction Tax
Would Tax Savings for millions of Americans

Washington, DC, November 18, 2009—The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) today released a statement from Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., executive vice president, public policy and advocacy on a legislative proposal that would impose a tax on securities, futures and derivative transactions. 

“Imposing a tax on financial transactions is the wrong idea at the wrong time. Such a tax would likely result in a stalling of the stock market, cutting off companies’ ability to raise capital to fund new investments in plants and equipment, and thus create jobs. 

“Furthermore, it would directly and detrimentally affect millions of Americans by imposing a tax on their savings such as mutual funds, just as they are seeing their investment assets regain value. Additionally, the exemptions contained in the proposed legislation are completely unworkable.

“At a time when we are in the beginning stages of economic recovery, imposing a tax that would actually constrict economic expansion is bad policy. The better policy direction to ensure any future financial crisis does not result in an economic downturn is establishing a strong systemic risk regulator and clear, unambiguous resolution authority for failing institutions.”

http://www.sifma.org/news/news.aspx?id=13970</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Press Release<br />
Release Date: November 18, 2009</p>
<p>SIFMA Opposes Securities Transaction Tax<br />
Would Tax Savings for millions of Americans</p>
<p>Washington, DC, November 18, 2009—The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) today released a statement from Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., executive vice president, public policy and advocacy on a legislative proposal that would impose a tax on securities, futures and derivative transactions. </p>
<p>“Imposing a tax on financial transactions is the wrong idea at the wrong time. Such a tax would likely result in a stalling of the stock market, cutting off companies’ ability to raise capital to fund new investments in plants and equipment, and thus create jobs. </p>
<p>“Furthermore, it would directly and detrimentally affect millions of Americans by imposing a tax on their savings such as mutual funds, just as they are seeing their investment assets regain value. Additionally, the exemptions contained in the proposed legislation are completely unworkable.</p>
<p>“At a time when we are in the beginning stages of economic recovery, imposing a tax that would actually constrict economic expansion is bad policy. The better policy direction to ensure any future financial crisis does not result in an economic downturn is establishing a strong systemic risk regulator and clear, unambiguous resolution authority for failing institutions.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sifma.org/news/news.aspx?id=13970" rel="nofollow">http://www.sifma.org/news/news.aspx?id=13970</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Buy Acular Without Prescription</title>
		<link>http://shopyield.com/2009/11/19/taxing-derivatives-excessive-leverage-and-a-jobs-program/#comment-10300</link>
		<dc:creator>cate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shopyield.com/?p=5591#comment-10300</guid>
		<description>Wall Street tax must be international: Pelosi

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Any tax imposed on financial transactions would have to take effect internationally to keep Wall Street jobs and related business from moving overseas, U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Thursday.

"It would have to be an international rule, not just a U.S. rule," Pelosi said at a news conference. "We couldn't do it alone, we'd have to do it as an international initiative."

Several House Democrats have proposed a Wall Street tax to pay for job-creating legislation they plan to pass in December. The tax, which could raise $150 billion per year, would tap into widespread public outrage at Wall Street in the wake of the financial crisis.

"There's something really out of kilter in this society," said Democratic Representative Marcy Kaptur, noting the gap between wages in her Ohio district and Wall Street bonuses.

But support is tepid among key legislators, especially those from the New York region who worry that finance jobs could disappear if the tax drives trading activity overseas.

The No. 4 Democrat in the House, Representative John Larson, said his proposal to impose a 0.25 percent tax on over-the-counter derivatives transactions would apply internationally.

"Part of our proposal would include that it would be international," Larson told Reuters after meeting with other lawmakers about the jobs package.

Democratic Representative Peter DeFazio said his separate proposal, which would tax a wider array of trading activity, would cover all U.S. corporations and individuals no matter where their trades took place.

Pelosi and other Democratic leaders have emphasized that the proposal is merely one of many ideas in play.

"It hasn't been developed to a high priority, but it has substantial currency in our caucus," Pelosi said.

Britain urged other governments earlier this month to consider a bank tax as a way to fund future bailouts, and France and Germany have also called for a bank tax. The International Monetary Fund is studying the idea.

LITTLE ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT

But it has little support in the Obama administration.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Thursday that he has "not seen a version of that tax that I think would be appropriate for our country."

Democrats are developing their jobs bill to ease double-digit unemployment levels that threaten an economic recovery. The Senate is expected to act early next year. 

http://www.reuters.com/article/wtUSInvestingNews/idUSTRE5AI3ZV20091119</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall Street tax must be international: Pelosi</p>
<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Any tax imposed on financial transactions would have to take effect internationally to keep Wall Street jobs and related business from moving overseas, U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Thursday.</p>
<p>&#8220;It would have to be an international rule, not just a U.S. rule,&#8221; Pelosi said at a news conference. &#8220;We couldn&#8217;t do it alone, we&#8217;d have to do it as an international initiative.&#8221;</p>
<p>Several House Democrats have proposed a Wall Street tax to pay for job-creating legislation they plan to pass in December. The tax, which could raise $150 billion per year, would tap into widespread public outrage at Wall Street in the wake of the financial crisis.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s something really out of kilter in this society,&#8221; said Democratic Representative Marcy Kaptur, noting the gap between wages in her Ohio district and Wall Street bonuses.</p>
<p>But support is tepid among key legislators, especially those from the New York region who worry that finance jobs could disappear if the tax drives trading activity overseas.</p>
<p>The No. 4 Democrat in the House, Representative John Larson, said his proposal to impose a 0.25 percent tax on over-the-counter derivatives transactions would apply internationally.</p>
<p>&#8220;Part of our proposal would include that it would be international,&#8221; Larson told Reuters after meeting with other lawmakers about the jobs package.</p>
<p>Democratic Representative Peter DeFazio said his separate proposal, which would tax a wider array of trading activity, would cover all U.S. corporations and individuals no matter where their trades took place.</p>
<p>Pelosi and other Democratic leaders have emphasized that the proposal is merely one of many ideas in play.</p>
<p>&#8220;It hasn&#8217;t been developed to a high priority, but it has substantial currency in our caucus,&#8221; Pelosi said.</p>
<p>Britain urged other governments earlier this month to consider a bank tax as a way to fund future bailouts, and France and Germany have also called for a bank tax. The International Monetary Fund is studying the idea.</p>
<p>LITTLE ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT</p>
<p>But it has little support in the Obama administration.</p>
<p>Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Thursday that he has &#8220;not seen a version of that tax that I think would be appropriate for our country.&#8221;</p>
<p>Democrats are developing their jobs bill to ease double-digit unemployment levels that threaten an economic recovery. The Senate is expected to act early next year. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/wtUSInvestingNews/idUSTRE5AI3ZV20091119" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/wtUSInvestingNews/idUSTRE5AI3ZV20091119</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

